<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Darwinian Heresy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://illegiterati.com/2009/08/01/the-darwinian-heresy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://illegiterati.com/2009/08/01/the-darwinian-heresy/</link>
	<description>We have opinions.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 12:35:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James James</title>
		<link>http://illegiterati.com/2009/08/01/the-darwinian-heresy/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 23:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://illegiterati.com/?p=151#comment-224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe they focus on Darwin because they confuse knowledge with belief, and want to debate scientific inquiry as an alternative belief system. That&#039;s why they refer to the theory of evolution as &quot;Darwinism&quot;, as if it were some kind of political movement with a murky agenda, founded by Charles Darwin.

See for example The View&#039;s May 5th debate on evolution:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/05/the-view-argues-about-dar_n_196852.html

This way, scientific findings are merely opinions, subject to debate and persuasion, just like the many competing supernatural belief systems.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe they focus on Darwin because they confuse knowledge with belief, and want to debate scientific inquiry as an alternative belief system. That&#8217;s why they refer to the theory of evolution as &#8220;Darwinism&#8221;, as if it were some kind of political movement with a murky agenda, founded by Charles Darwin.</p>
<p>See for example The View&#8217;s May 5th debate on evolution:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/05/the-view-argues-about-dar_n_196852.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/05/the-view-argues-about-dar_n_196852.html</a></p>
<p>This way, scientific findings are merely opinions, subject to debate and persuasion, just like the many competing supernatural belief systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

